Tag Archives: hope

Obama Can Keep the 60’s from Coming Back

By Stephen Noriega

I believe that Barack Obama can avert another 60’s. Perhaps this sounds counterintuitive or even pessimistic. It is not meant to be either. The election of Barack Obama brings on another possibility. It is the possibility of breaking unfortunate repetitions of human behavior. Barack Obama may be able to circumvent a simmering resentment of our government that made so much in the 1960’s necessary and so painful to many.

People often look back on the 60’s and early 70’s with a definite degree of romanticism. People with long hair, making love in the forest and singing beautiful music can warm the hearts of aging accountants with revisionist personal histories. The 60’s make people think of the Age of Aquarius, a time when so many things were possible and the only limitations existed in the mind and the quality of the mushrooms. The ‘60’s is thought of as a time of social revolution tied with the embrace of the wretched, two concepts rarely seen together in political history.

hair-theatreaddictcom72007TheatreAddicts.com 7/2007

However, the 60’s also meant the burning of American cities, the murder of ideological activists and the beginning of American adventurism in the form of spreading terror as well as democracy in the world. A few people during this time recorded great accomplishments, often at the cost of their own lives. The 60’s brought into the public consciousness the images of dogs attacking black people, naked girls running from napalm and dead students at formerly quiet universities.


kent-state-1970john-paul-filo1John Paul Filo, 1970

Others simply rode the wave of this time for their own amusement. Tim Leary might have had great progressive ideas, but he really just wanted to get high. Leary became psychologically addicted to LSD and tried to get as many bright minds to follow him into his own Wonderland. I know he talked about things much deeper, but he will never be known for anything more. He went on tour with G. Gordon Liddy twenty years later.

Jerry Rubin ran wild in the 1960’s, generating counter-culture sloganism and culminating his urination on conservative society with activities in the 1968 Democratic National Convention that resulted in the Chicago 8 / Chicago 7 Trial. When the bills didn’t get paid with political petulance, Rubin became a business investor. He went on tour with Abbie Hoffman for a fee in the 1980’s. When Abbie Hoffman died, he and David Dellinger were the only ones out of the Chicago 8 / Chicago 7 at his funeral. Rubin was killed by a car with a significant stock holding in Apple Corporation.

Martin Luther King, Jr. brought the concept of Satyagraha to North America and proved that racial oppression could be fought without a single gun or bomb. He insisted that his protesters dressed formally so they would not look like hippies and thugs. He insisted that people did not fight the authorities even when the authorities injured them. He gained wonderful momentum, bringing the Kennedy family into the fight, Robert much more willingly than John. Even Malcolm X, changed by his hajj to Mecca (yes, that’s right, Mecca in the 60’s was an origin of racial harmony) and influenced by King, Jr., changed his tune to one of more peaceful resolution. The 60’s also brought the assassins that killed Martin Luther King, Jr. Malcolm X, Robert Kennedy and John F. Kennedy. After that, racial progress fell into inconsistency, self-service and sublime discrimination.

The 60’s had the Great Society, a well-intended but mishandled attempt to keep the cities from burning and to bring the poor out of the ashes. Lyndon Johnson tried to keep a war going while redistributing wealth at the same time. Eventually something had to break and the Great Society fell first. Then Vietnam fell into the hands of the communists and the American spirit slowly fell into a “malaise”.


Time Magazine, 2007

These times have many similarities to the negative side of the 60’s, only without a decent drug to escape it all. Instead of pot and LSD to deny our problems, we have crack and meth, drugs that destroy instead of simply cover. We have unpopular military actions, this time in two countries and possibly three. Even as we boast about our progress in Iraq, we see Afghanistan fall into chaos and Iran apparently asking to be attacked by our impatient and reactionary leadership. Immigrants make up a new class of people to be hated and persecuted. Notice how the word for undocumented people went from “immigrant workers” to “illegal immigrants” to the objects, “illegals”. Minorities and young Americans openly question the veracity of governing institutions, although their numbers in protest are miniscule compared with yesteryear.

convention2bthecloudcrimethinccom2008Crimethinc.com, 2008

Barack Obama does not represent merely a revolt from the diseased status quo, in spite of what Rush Limbaugh might say. Barack Obama is part of both the old guard and needed revolution. Obama is an Ivy League educated, well-connected part of the political culture. He is also an African American with ideas of community organization, social justice and strong international negotiation. Barack Obama is quite capable of shifting paradigms from existing paradigms at the same time. Obama can push for economic justice while railing against deadbeat fathers that won’t pay for their children. Barack Obama can speak of talking with our enemies while promising to throw bombs into Pakistan if it means killing Osama bin Laden.

obamahopeprogressneublack022008Neublack.com, 2008

Barack Obama has many problems to face but much credit to take if things even go from terrible to bad. He can refresh our view of government while not feeling stripped of its protective duties. Barack Obama can encourage us to think beyond our present position while remaining responsible to ourselves and society. The time of the Great Society brought just as much violence and self service as historical progress. Barack Obama can usher some more, much needed, change while keeping us on task socially, personally and morally.



Filed under American Electorate, Democratic Party, Media, Obama, Protest

Why HOPE Rings True

By Alicia Long

It seems HOPE is the keyword this election.  In a year where the economy is in a downward spiral, America is looked down upon within the international community, people are losing not only their pensions and 401Ks but their homes, HOPE is the only thing that some have left.

Obama’s campaign slogan, “Change we can believe in” gets right to what Americans want.  This tagline encompasses the feelings of frustration people have with the current administration, yet encourages HOPE with the ability to BELIEVE.  Having lasted through eight years of fear-mongering and the dumbing-down of the American public, people are desperately looking for some light at the end of the tunnel.  They are looking for something to get excited about.  Obama didn’t have to portray himself as a rock star – people were LOOKING for a rock star.

McCain has had a little more trouble gaining traction in this election, and I think it has a lot to do with HOPE.  His first big campaign tagline was “A leader we can believe in.”  This instills HOPE in the same way that Obama’s tagline does, with HOPE being a necessary part in BELIEVING.  However, what we find ourselves hoping for with McCain is a “leader.”  I think the country saw a “leader” in Bush.  We voted for a strong-willed compassionate conservative who wasn’t afraid to make “tough decisions” – but look what we got. Yes, the country is looking for a strong leader in the 2008 election, but this is not what inspires us.

“Country First” was McCain’s next and current slogan.  The success of this tagline frames the belief that the current administration and/or Obama put their interests over the interests of the country.  In other words, country comes second or last.  McCain wants to put the country first.  This makes sense in every logical sense, because who would want a president that didn’t put the “country first?”  Again, however, he doesn’t inspire HOPE with this message.  Candidate after candidate has promised to do what is in the best interest of the country.  It’s a tired message and the last thing McCain wants voters to do is to associate him with old, tried messaging.

A relatively new tagline McCain has used at the end of his television commercials spikes more interest in me.  At the end of his latest ads he uses his familiar McCain-Palin symbol, but instead of their names he puts “Change is coming.”  This is what I believe he should have been framing his campaign on from the beginning.  This tagline instills HOPE in the voter by subtly suggesting that Obama is not the change he claims to be, and that McCain is marching valiantly towards the Whitehouse to save the country from itself.  He’s coming… he’ll be here any minute.  He’s coming… he’s the one to lift our country out of its sad state.  He’s coming to rescue us.

This entire election is about HOPE.  Obama didn’t invent this – he simply recognized it faster than McCain or any of the other Democratic candidates.  McCain finally figured this out, but sadly Obama already branded himself as the “HOPE” candidate.  Through his taglines and his framing of the campaign, Obama (intentionally or by accident) has successfully unlocked what America wants.  2008 was all about the correct message, and that message is HOPE.


Filed under McCain, Obama